I take everything I read with a grain of salt these days, and have for many years. When I read an article or see a television report that makes sensational claims, I try to fact check on my own, because I no longer trust most journalists to have done it for me. There are several major areas that journalists particularly suck at:via
- Science reporting. I have a degree in fine arts, and I could write better science articles than most science writers could. Any journalist who suggested that Fukushima could be “another Chernobyl” should be made to retake his 9th grade science class and then have his journalist license revoked.
- Oh wait… Reporting on Japan. JAPAN IS SOOO WEIRD! JAPANESE PEOPLE HAVE NO EMOTION! If everything you think you know about Japan was learned from the movies Gung Ho and Mr. Baseball, then maybe you’re not qualified to write an article about Japan. Also, spending a few days, hell, even a month in Japan (probably in a hotel or furnished apartment, or otherwise isolated location) does not make you an expert on the place. Nor does interviewing someone who has lived here for a few months (or even year, if living in one of the many gaijin bubbles).
- Disaster reporting. Two and a half words: Exaggeration and fear-mongering.
This is not new information. Not to me, and probably not to you. However, in the aftermath of the quake, all three of these elements joined together to create (to use a term journalists are so fond of using themselves) the “perfect storm”. News piece after news piece full of inaccuracies, misinterpretations, and just plain lies. (My favourites are the photos, shown out-of-context. For instance, showing a photo of a girl in a surgical-style mask and implying that she was wearing it due to radiation, while the reality is that we’re in allergy season here and many people wear masks to keep pollen at bay.)
vendredi 18 mars 2011
Why Bad Journalism Has Driven Me To Desperate Ends
»» Why Bad Journalism Has Driven Me To Desperate Ends
blogué par Jean Ruaud